When was the tickell review

The EYFS is underpinned by four principles, creating the foundations for learning and the seven areas of learning and development. The EYFS was recently revised in and again earlier this year, The Dame Tickell review revealed gaps and difficulties in practice and these findings led to the revised EYFS in enduring many changes to improve this. The Dame Tickell review also suggested that the 69 early learning goals for children to achieve by the end of the foundation stage should be reduced to 17 goals due to a certain amount of overlap Gaunt, The Early Years Foundation Stage EYFS was introduced in to provide a framework for consistent and high quality environments for all children in pre-school settings.

A review was promised at the time, and Dame Clare Tickell Chief Executive of Action for Children was invited last summer by the government to conduct an independent review that was evidence-led, built on what works well and improved those areas where there are problems.

We'd like to use additional cookies to remember your settings and understand how you use our services. This information will help us make improvements to the website. Find a link in the catalogue description to the archived website that holds the record. This series contains dated gathered versions or 'snapshots' of the Tickell Review of the Early Years Foundation Stage website.

Please see information at Divisional level. The review reported on 30 March 'The Early Years: Foundations for life, health and learning' with a view to implementing any changes from September onwards. Have you found an error with this catalogue description? Let us know. If you provide contact details, we will be in touch about your request within 10 working days. Results from both assessments were compared to examine validity. Both the new and published scoring methods showed good concurrent validity, however the new scoring method demonstrated better criterion-related validity in terms of higher sensitivity, comparable specificity, generally higher over-referrals, and lower under-referrals.

The Schedule of Growing Skills II could be a valid, cost-effective way of screening for developmental delay in young children using this new, more sensitive scoring method.

Related Articles:. Home References Article citations. Journals A-Z.