Is it possible to have your soul taken

Although some religions do not adhere to this simple outlook, most faiths ask us to believe that we are more than this mortal flesh and blood. If you are religious, you harbour a profound conviction that your soul connects you to God, and the struggle of the soul, whether it is cast down and troubled or joyous and raised in triumph, is the life of spirit, East and West. And it is clear that the soul is beyond the world and more valuable than everything we encounter from birth to death.

As the Book of Matthew declares, "For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Yet religion did not manage to make the soul stick. If it had, we would never have heard the terrible words 'Auschwitz', 'H-bomb', 'ethnic cleansing', 'terrorism', and all those other signifiers of violence that depend on a mass ignorance of the soul.

The second birth of the soul will make it stick. I say this with some confidence because for almost a hundred years we have been staring directly at the proof of the soul.

It has been as plain as love, truth, and beauty - to name other invisible things that we are certain of - yet proof of the soul comes from a strange place, a quarter that has no religion in it. Quantum physics, the greatest intellectual triumph of the 20th century, has made the spiritual worldview completely believable.

Einstein and his brilliant cohorts saw beyond the horizon of time and space; they went into the invisible domain where the soul must also exist. In going there, however, they did not pack religious words in their suitcases, and therefore references to God and the soul were sidelined in favour of quarks, neutrinos, relativity, and worm-holes. These words mean little to ordinary people, even to this day, and the fact that they refer to the soul's territory comes as a revelation.

Only a handful of physicists have realised as Einstein himself did that a theory of the cosmos must inevitably be a theory of how God's mind works. Both aim at the ultimate source of reality. To make the soul stick, the obscurity of quantum theory has to become clear and simple enough that people will say, "Ah, so that's what my soul is. Who knows? As the devastatingly honest French writer Simone Weil has said, "In what concerns divine things, belief is not appropriate.

Only certainty will do. Anything less than certainty is unworthy of God. Time and space are the glass through which we view the soul. Causation is the mechanics through which the soul acts in the world. Surprisingly, the soul behaves very much like the subatomic world that physicists are exploring today.

Let us look at some startling similarities. In the quantum world there are no material things, only possibility waves. In other words, a quantum event can potentially occur in two places at the same time. The same is true of your consciousness: you can be conversing with me and worrying about your mother's health at the same time.

In the quantum world two subatomic particles, even though they may be at separate ends of the universe, can be in communication with each other, correlating their activities even though they don't exchange signals. This is called non-local acausal relationship. Your consciousness operates in a similar way. When you start to think, you activate different parts of your brain that in microscopic terms are the equivalent of millions of miles apart. All these different parts are in communication with each other, and their activities are correlated, even though there are no electrical or other signals being exchanged between them.

Consciousness orchestrates quantum mechanical non-local, acausal interrelatedness through mere intention. In the quantum realm there is a phenomenon known as the quantum leap. A particle can move from one location to another without travelling through the space in between. Negative thoughts and low energy. Difficulty being present. How to start healing your soul on your own. Practice meditation and mindfulness.

Get in touch with your guides. Try self-hypnosis. The bottom line. Sarah Regan. Alexandra Engler. Eliza Sullivan. Jamie Schneider. Latest Articles Off-the-Grid. Emma Loewe. Integrative Health. Functional Food. Simon Hill. Lindsay Boyers. Previous Next.

Folder Name. Our brains do such a wonderful job of pinning us in reality that we often forget that the pins are an illusion and can, therefore, sometimes be shaken loose.

In another study conducted by Blanke, he and his team studied six neurological patients with brain lesions that caused them to experience occasional OBEs. So, what do we know about this region of the brain? The TPJ is an area that collates a range of information. It is a hub of activity, with inputs from the thalamus which relays sensory information and the limbic system which is important in emotion and memory.

It also takes data from the visual, auditory, and somatosensory bodily sensations systems. The TPJ integrates information from the external environment as well as from within the body.

It is thought to play a part in the distinction between self and other, which makes the TPJ a prime contender for the seat of OBEs. Why OBEs should happen to people who are otherwise healthy is still a mystery. The difference with OBEs is that they attack our sense of self, something that we hold dear yet take for granted.

For a moment, we feel ethereal — we feel as though we are not one, sensing our flimsy transient nature. Of course, our personalities, emotions, memories, and desires are all little more than peaks and troughs in energy levels and surges of chemicals. We know this, but our brains do not normally allow us to feel it. We have all seen ourselves from outside, in mediums such as photos and mirrors.

We have all seen rooms from above, and weaved fairytales in our minds. Therefore, it is not such a push to imagine that our brains could manufacture an OBE and present it to us as a fleeting reality. Our brain does a mighty job of hiding the truth from us.

We feel as though we are a solid, singular entity, with our mind and body combined and secure in their rightful places, a monolith in the cosmos. OBEs unravel this sense of self, proving that we are little more than a skillful neurological illusion after all. Blackfishing is a type of interpersonal racism that depicts Black people as stereotypes and portrays Black culture as a product. It ignores the…. Online anger management classes are available to those wanting to learn how to better deal with their emotions.

So any respectable scientist who took this idea seriously would be asking -- what form does that interaction take?

Is it local in spacetime? Does the soul respect gauge invariance and Lorentz invariance? Does the soul have a Hamiltonian?

Do the interactions preserve unitarity and conservation of information? Nobody ever asks these questions out loud, possibly because of how silly they sound.

It's not a difficult decision, as scientific theory-choice goes. We don't choose theories in a vacuum. We are allowed -- indeed, required -- to ask how claims about how the world works fit in with other things we know about how the world works. I've been talking here like a particle physicist, but there's an analogous line of reasoning that would come from evolutionary biology. Presumably amino acids and proteins don't have souls that persist after death.

What about viruses or bacteria? Where upon the chain of evolution from our monocellular ancestors to today did organisms stop being described purely as atoms interacting through gravity and electromagnetism, and develop an immaterial immortal soul?

There's no reason to be agnostic about ideas that are dramatically incompatible with everything we know about modern science.

Once we get over any reluctance to face reality on this issue, we can get down to the much more interesting questions of how human beings and consciousness really work. Sean Carroll is a physicist and author. He received his Ph. His Twitter handle is seanmcarroll. Cross-posted on Cosmic Variance. The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American. The views expressed are those of the author s and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Already a subscriber?