Which detail is not a characteristic of an editorial

But it analyses evidence rather than produces it. Of course what it analyses can be the basis of the production of new evidence. However, it goes beyond an analysis. It must necessarily also express an opinion. It must attempt to critically analyse and sift from the various opinions, analyses and evidences floating around.

Moreover, a good editorial is contemporary without being populist. An editorial is predominantly about balance. But that does not prevent it from occasionally stirring things up, when such is the need. Hence a hard-hitting editorial is as legitimate as a balanced equipoise that reconciles apparently conflicting positions and controversial posturings, whether amongst politicians in news papers , or amongst researchers in academic journals.

All said and done, the element of balance can never be lost. For that, it certainly helps if an editor is a balanced individual by temperament as well.

However, let it not mean that balance in temperament excludes crusading zeal. Most editors of some merit have the latter in reasonable quantity, although they may play it down, or publicly make a mockery of it, since it is the in thing to do the mockery, not the crusading. Moreover, denial can be a strong defense mechanism, as much in editors as in the rest of humanity. Make no mistake about it. Forget the loud protestation to the contrary.

Scratch the surface of any good editor who enjoys his job, and a crusader will shine through. To sum up, a good editorial is either one or more of the following: it is an opinion maker, it is reconciliatory between contrary viewpoints or standpoints, it is balanced in its analysis of evidence and events, and it is, manifest or otherwise, crusading in its thrust.

An editorial is traditionally written in a literary style. While it is difficult to define what a literary style is, let us say it is one in which thought is well clothed in language. So well that an editorial may make for a literary piece in literature, aside and apart from its factual or scientific content.

However, having said that, it must be noted that an editorial is not only a literary piece. It must also express a firm and balanced opinion on something, an opinion that clarifies the muddle into which committed writers and researchers may lead the reader.

At no stage must the language overshadow the thought, however. That is a subtle distinction to maintain. The thought may be embellished by language, not drowned in it.

No one likes to read the same words over and over again, so a strong, robust vocabulary is an asset to any good writer. Incorporating interesting and unusual words into their writing, this skill helps them maintain a reader's interest and allows them to communicate more effectively by accessing the perfect word for any situation. Being open to external edits and suggestions is key for exceptional writers because it enables them to improve their writing, even though it might damage their ego in the meantime.

Open-mindedness allows them to see their work through the eyes of others and improve weak points. Voracious readers often make great writers, because being immersed in a world of words helps one better understand the nuts and bolts of writing like syntax, tone, framing, etc. If you read through this list and felt like you could improve upon some of the qualities outlined here, start today. Persuade: Editorials of persuasion aim to immediately see the solution, not the problem.

From the first paragraph, readers will be encouraged to take a specific, positive action. Political endorsements are good examples of editorials of persuasion. Praise: These editorials commend people and organizations for something done well.

They are not as common as the other three. Writing an Editorial 1. Pick a significant topic that has a current news angle and would interest readers. Collect information and facts; include objective reporting; do research 3. State your opinion briefly in the fashion of a thesis statement 4.

Explain the issue objectively as a reporter would and tell why this situation is important 5. Give opposing viewpoint first with its quotations and facts 6. Refute reject the other side and develop your case using facts, details, figures, quotations. Pick apart the other side's logic.

Concede a point of the opposition — they must have some good points you can acknowledge that would make you look rational. Repeat key phrases to reinforce an idea into the reader's minds. Give a realistic solution s to the problem that goes beyond common knowledge. Often, Entertaining Editorial are of Two Types.

One is the short humorous treatment of a light topic. The second is a slightly satirical treatment of a serious subject. It evokes a smile, a chuckle, laughter, while suggesting truth. Its main aim is to entertain. It is usually short. As, already mentioned, the purpose of an editorial is to indulge in constructive criticism. This type of editorial is of no use, if it does not provide solution to the problems. It points out the good or the bad features of a problem or situation mentioned in the news.

Its purpose is to influence the reader. Sometimes it also suggests a solution at the end. It praises, commends, or pays tribute to a person or organization that has performed some worthwhile projects or deeds, or accomplishments. Introduction to Journalism. What is Editorial?